<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You Resend Your Emails to Subscribers Who Didn&#8217;t Open Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them</link>
	<description>Practical Blogging Tips You Can Use Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 06:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingteacher.com/?p=1748#comment-3526</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

I read with interest Pat&#039;s suggestion when he posted it and I think you&#039;ve come up with a good idea, too. I think one should test both methods and see what the results are. You won&#039;t really know until you try. It would be nice to try using different subscribers though in order not to skew the results of being first or second method.

Have you adopted any method and what were your results?

Thanks,
Karen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>I read with interest Pat&#8217;s suggestion when he posted it and I think you&#8217;ve come up with a good idea, too. I think one should test both methods and see what the results are. You won&#8217;t really know until you try. It would be nice to try using different subscribers though in order not to skew the results of being first or second method.</p>
<p>Have you adopted any method and what were your results?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Karen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Sarauer</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Sarauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingteacher.com/?p=1748#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>My open rate runs high so I probably won&#039;t change anything overall. I&#039;d follow Pat&#039;s system if there was a deadline on a product/event I knew would be of interest to readers who hadn&#039;t opened the first email, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My open rate runs high so I probably won&#8217;t change anything overall. I&#8217;d follow Pat&#8217;s system if there was a deadline on a product/event I knew would be of interest to readers who hadn&#8217;t opened the first email, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingteacher.com/?p=1748#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>Yeah none of this stuff suits every situation perfectly.  If it did we&#039;d all be rich right ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah none of this stuff suits every situation perfectly.  If it did we&#8217;d all be rich right ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggingteacher.com/should-you-resend-your-emails-to-subscribers-who-didnt-open-them#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggingteacher.com/?p=1748#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>Great follow up to my post Paul, and thanks for not totally bashing the technique I mentioned, while still providing a alternative. As I mentioned in my post, I&#039;ve used it on my other lists without any complaint, but only after waiting a good number of days, re-writing the subject line and content, and being honest about the re-send. If I have an important email, such as a deadline in the industry that my subscribers really should read, then I feel I almost have to make sure I give them the best chance to see that email, and sometimes that means a resend.

Often times, my emails don&#039;t include links at all, just important information - so the link technique (which is very smart!) will not work in such cases. 

Cheers Paul!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great follow up to my post Paul, and thanks for not totally bashing the technique I mentioned, while still providing a alternative. As I mentioned in my post, I&#8217;ve used it on my other lists without any complaint, but only after waiting a good number of days, re-writing the subject line and content, and being honest about the re-send. If I have an important email, such as a deadline in the industry that my subscribers really should read, then I feel I almost have to make sure I give them the best chance to see that email, and sometimes that means a resend.</p>
<p>Often times, my emails don&#8217;t include links at all, just important information &#8211; so the link technique (which is very smart!) will not work in such cases. </p>
<p>Cheers Paul!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 433/438 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.bloggingteacher.com @ 2012-02-08 18:27:00 -->
